OEMs & importers
You cannot manage a network on a spreadsheet it resents sending.
Replace late, inconsistent submissions with figures produced by the work itself. Dealers not on the platform remain visible as no data, never as an estimate.
Campaign 24-C · uptake
Sample data · covered network only
Praha
- Eligible
- –
- Complete
- No data
- Context
- Not on platform
The uncovered row is intentionally retained. R-SOL-05 requires honest gaps rather than estimates; coverage and interface availability are confirmed per brand and market.
- Best fit
- OEMs and importers with a meaningful share of dealers already running Omnetic in one or more markets.
- Operational job
- Collect comparable campaign, stock, service, warranty and registration data as a by-product of dealer work, within the exact scope the brand agreement permits.
- What you get
- Campaign and warranty evidence from covered dealers, with data gaps visible.
The submission problem
Why network data is always late and always disputed
A dealer filling in your template is translating their reality into your definitions, from memory, on a Friday. Every step of that introduces error nobody can audit afterwards.
Stock and ageing
A snapshot on the day they remembered, with ‘days in stock’ meaning three different things
Campaign uptake
Counted by hand, weeks late, so a stalled campaign is discovered after it mattered
Service throughput
Job counts without hours, so you cannot tell busy from inefficient
Warranty quality
Claims arrive with thin evidence and get queried, which costs both sides
Registrations
Retyped into a portal, so bonus disputes are about data entry rather than sales
Certified-used compliance
A checklist in a folder at the dealer, audited by visiting
System relationship
A connected workflow for OEMs & importers
OEMs & importers
One campaign, one quarter
Five things an importer does that a dealer never has to
Each one currently depends on dealers doing you a favour. Select one.
A campaign that reaches the vehicle, not the inbox
A bulletin depends on one person at each dealer reading it and remembering. Eligibility written onto the vehicle means the next time that car is booked, the campaign is already on the job. The dealer does not have to want to help. They just have to open the car.
A bulletin depends on one person at each dealer reading it and remembering. Eligibility written onto the vehicle means the next time that car is booked, the campaign is already on the job. The dealer does not have to want to help. They just have to open the car.
- You send
- Campaign 24-C, affected VIN range, labour allowance
- Omnetic
- Flags eligibility on each matching vehicle across every dealer on the platform
- Dealer sees
- The campaign inside the next booking, priced and attributed to you
Uptake you can act on while it still matters
Completion comes from the work order, so uptake is current rather than counted. A dealer at thirty-six per cent is visible in week three, not in the post-mortem. Because the reason is on the record, the conversation is about capacity rather than commitment.
Completion comes from the work order, so uptake is current rather than counted. A dealer at thirty-six per cent is visible in week three, not in the post-mortem. Because the reason is on the record, the conversation is about capacity rather than commitment.
- You send
- Eligible, completed and outstanding per dealer, updated as jobs close
- Omnetic
- Aggregates from work orders, never from a form somebody filled in
- Dealer sees
- Plzeň at 36% flagged in week three with the reason attached
Claims that arrive with their evidence
Most warranty friction is evidential: you query a claim, the dealer reconstructs it, both sides lose a week. A claim raised from the work order carries its hours, parts and photographs taken at the time.
Most warranty friction is evidential: you query a claim, the dealer reconstructs it, both sides lose a week. A claim raised from the work order carries its hours, parts and photographs taken at the time.
- You send
- Claim from the job: 0.9 h, one pump, four photographs, VIN and mileage
- Omnetic
- Prepares it complete · submission automation varies by brand interface
- Dealer sees
- Something you can assess rather than question
One definition across the network
Network comparison only works if a metric means the same thing everywhere. Dealers on the platform produce identical definitions because the definition lives in the platform rather than in each dealer's habits.
Network comparison only works if a metric means the same thing everywhere. Dealers on the platform produce identical definitions because the definition lives in the platform rather than in each dealer's habits.
- You send
- Stock, ageing, throughput and campaign uptake on one definition
- Omnetic
- Reports from events, with dealers not on the platform shown as no data rather than estimated
- Dealer sees
- A network view whose gaps are visible instead of filled in
Certified-used compliance without a site visit
A certified-used checklist held on the vehicle, with its inspection photographs and findings, can be audited from where you are. The dealer benefits too: the evidence defends them when a customer complains.
A certified-used checklist held on the vehicle, with its inspection photographs and findings, can be audited from where you are. The dealer benefits too: the evidence defends them when a customer complains.
- You send
- What the programme requires per vehicle
- Omnetic
- Holds the completed checklist and its evidence on the vehicle record
- Dealer sees
- Remotely, on what the agreement grants you · nothing more
Data governance
The dealer's data is the dealer's. You see what the agreement defines.
This is the sentence that decides whether a network programme is adopted or resisted. An importer who can see a dealer's whole business will not be trusted with any of it. So brand visibility is scoped explicitly, the dealer can see exactly what you can see, and every read is logged on both sides.
Every brand read is logged and visible to the dealer. The exact scope is contractual per brand and per market, and this table is the shape of that conversation rather than a published entitlement.
Outcome & proof
Four people at the importer
Network development manager
Visits dealers to develop the business rather than to collect a spreadsheet, and arrives already knowing which conversation to have.
Aftersales director
Sees throughput with hours attached, so a busy dealer and an inefficient one stop looking identical.
Warranty manager
Receives claims with evidence, which cuts query cycles in both directions and makes fraud easier to spot honestly.
Data protection officer
Gets a scoped, logged, contractual boundary instead of a spreadsheet emailed monthly with whatever the dealer happened to include.
What an importer asks first
Programme start
How a network programme starts
Coverage
How many of your dealers are already on the platform, per market. This comes first because it determines whether there is a programme at all.
Scope
What the brand may read, agreed with dealers rather than imposed on them, and written into the agreement.
One campaign
Run a single real campaign through it. Uptake visible per dealer is the proof, and it is cheap to test.
Widen
Warranty evidence, network comparison and remote certified-used audit, in whatever order your standards need.
Ask how much of your network is covered
Coverage per brand and market decides whether the programme is useful. It is the first answer, including when it is not enough to proceed.
Tell us about your networkLive, comparable definitions
Stock, ageing and throughput come from events instead of Friday templates.
Campaign on the vehicle
Eligibility and completion follow the VIN and work order, not an inbox bulletin.
A visible data boundary
The dealer sees what the brand can read; every access is scoped and logged.